Skip to main content

iRubric: RFP Vendor Evaluation Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
RFP Vendor Evaluation Rubric 
Rubric Code: N4B47
By teachme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric RFP Vendor Evaluation Rubric
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Product Description
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

The product and its purpose are clearly described. The reader knows precisely what items are being reviewed and their relevance to the project is immediately apparent.
Accomplished/Good

The product researched is clearly defined and described in the paper. Topic is sufficiently narrow for adequate coverage.
Developing/Fair

Product is described adequately for the reader. Topic may still be too broad for the given length and scope of the project.
Deficient/Poor

No definition of the product researched in the paper, or the topic is so broad it cannot be adequately covered in the assigned length of the paper.
Available Products
4 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Products from both major and minor manufacturers are reviewed. Quantity of products reviewed is proportional to the size of the market.
Accomplished/Good

Review of products is thorough and extensive. Major manufacturers are included, but some specialized organizations may have been omitted.
Developing/Fair

A few relevant and inter-related products are described, but the reader is not confident that all relevant sources have been researched.
Deficient/Poor

Products described are not related to each other and are irrelevant to the project. Sources appear random and unrelated.
Product Specifications
3 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Product specifications and costs are clearly presented in one central location. All relevant features used in selecting the product are described. Tables of specifications are well organized.
Accomplished/Good

Product specifications and costs are clearly presented in one central location. Most important features used in product selection are described, with one or two minor omissions. Tables of specifications are well organized.
Developing/Fair

Product specifications and costs are included but are not organized in one central location. some important criteria are omitted. Information appears to be mostly cut and pasted from the web, with little modification from the student. Tables need to be included or need improvement.
Deficient/Poor

Product information is simply cut and pasted from the web. Product specifications and costs are not included or are very difficult to find. Poorly constructed tables.
Product Selection
3 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

All product/vendor selection criteria are presented (cost, performance, etc.) and all candidates are objectively evaluated. Reader can easily follow the reasons for product selection. The best products and vendors are selected.
Accomplished/Good

All product/vendor selection criteria are presented and all candidates are objectively evaluated. Reader can follow the reasons for product selection, but lapses in organization are present. The best products/vendors are selected.
Developing/Fair

Most, but not all, relevant selection criteria are presented. Candidates are objectively evaluated. Reasons for product selection may be difficult to follow, so there is some doubt that the best candidates were selected.
Deficient/Poor

Major selection criteria are omitted from the evaluation. Lack of organization makes it difficult to follow the reasons for product selection. The best products/vendors do not appear to be selected.
References
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

All information sources are listed at the end of the paper, along with date information was retrieved and a description of the web page, catalog, or brochure. All information in the report is clearly linked to the source list, including graphs and diagrams.
Accomplished/Good

All information sources are listed at the end of the paper. All information in the report is clearly linked to the source list. Some source information was omitted, but not enough to concern the reader about the validity of the reference.
Developing/Fair

Most information sources are stated somewhere in the paper, but it may be difficult to retrace the sources or the search.
Deficient/Poor

Information sources are not listed. References in the paper are almost untraceable.



Keywords:
  • vendor, RFP, patent, bid, product features



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n52