Skip to main content

iRubric: Keyboard Area Jury Grading Rubric & Form


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Keyboard Area Jury Grading Rubric & Form 
Rubric Code: P4C26
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Locked Rubric
History enabled
Subject: Music  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Component 1
  Honor (A) 28 - 30

30 pts

Excellent (A-) 25 - 27

27 pts

Good (B) 20 - 24

24 pts

Pass (C) 15 - 19

19 pts

Poor (D) 10 - 14

14 pts

Unsatisfactory (F) 0 - 9

9 pts

Notation Accuracy and Fluency
30 %

Honor (A) 28 - 30

Completely consistent and
accomplished fluency. Slips are
wholly insignificant.
Excellent (A-) 25 - 27

Excellent fluency with few errors.
Good (B) 20 - 24

Very good fluency. There are some errors, but a very good level of security.
Pass (C) 15 - 19

Good fluency. There are some
errors, but a good level of security overall.
Poor (D) 10 - 14

An inconsistent level of fluency.
Accuracy is unreliable.
Unsatisfactory (F) 0 - 9

Fluency is not achieved. Security in accuracy is lacking.
Technical Facility
30 %

Honor (A) 28 - 30

Completely assured technical facility. Exceptional control, flexibility and variety of tone. Filly expressive stylistic use of
articulation, phrasing and detail.
Excellent (A-) 25 - 27

Assured technical facility. Excellent control, flexibility and variety of tone. Highly expressive, stylistic use of
articulation, phrasing and detail.
Good (B) 20 - 24

Strong technical facility. Very good control, flexibility and variety of tone. Expressive,
stylistic use of articulation,
phrasing and detail.
Pass (C) 15 - 19

Reliable technical facility. Good
control, flexibility and variety of tone. Mostly expressive, stylistic use of articulation,
phrasing and detail.
Poor (D) 10 - 14

Unreliable technical facility. Inconsistent control, flexibility and variety of tone. Stylistic or
expressive use of articulation,
phrasing and detail is not persuasive.
Unsatisfactory (F) 0 - 9

Technical facility is not in evidence. Limited control,
flexibility and variety of tone.
Little stylistic or expressive use of articulation, phrasing and detail.
Communication and Interpretation
30 %

Honor (A) 28 - 30

A completely
consistent and
exceptionally high level of idiomatic engagement and
musical sensitivity. Highly effective communication of the repertoire. Fully persuasive, convincing
interpretations. Strong stagecraft and delivery,
Excellent (A-) 25 - 27

An excellent level of idiomatic
engagement and musical sensitivity. Very effective
communication of the repertoire. Highly persuasive, convincing interpretations.
Secure stagecraft and delivery.
Good (B) 20 - 24

A very good level of idiomatic
engagement and
musical sensitivity. Effective
communication of the repertoire. Persuasive,
convincing performances.
Largely secure stagecraft and
delivery.
Pass (C) 15 - 19

A good level of idiomatic
engagement and musical sensitivity. Generally effective communication of the repertoire. Generally
persuasive, convincing
interpretations overall. Mostly
secure stagecraft and delivery.
Poor (D) 10 - 14

An inconsistent level of idiomatic engagement and
musical sensitivity. Inconsistent communication of the repertoire. The interpretations are not fully persuasive or convincing.
Stagecraft and delivery lack
assurance.
Unsatisfactory (F) 0 - 9

Idiomatic and musical sensitivity are not in evidence. Communication is very restricted. The interpretations lack persuasion and
conviction. Stagecraft and
delivery are insecure.
Component 2
  Excellent (A) 9 - 10

10 pts

Good (A-) 7 - 8

8 pts

Merit (B) 5 - 6

6 pts

Pass (C) 3 - 4

4 pts

Poor (D) 1 - 2

2 pts

Unsatisfactory (F) 0

0 pts

Memorization
10 %

Excellent (A) 9 - 10

Completely secured memory.
Good (A-) 7 - 8

Excellent memory with some slips but recover well.
Merit (B) 5 - 6

Very good memory with minor
disruption.
Pass (C) 3 - 4

Obvious memory issue with minor disruption.
Poor (D) 1 - 2

Poor and insecure memory with
major disruption.
Unsatisfactory (F) 0

Unmemorized performance.
Degree Program
  B.M. in Keyboard Performance

(N/A)

B.A. in Music, Piano Principal

(N/A)

Music Minor, Piano Principal

(N/A)

Piano Class Substitution

Secondary Lesson

(N/A)

Piano Proficiency Preparation

Secondary Lesson

(N/A)

Non-music Major Fine Art Elective

Secondary Lesson

(N/A)

Degree Program
0 %

(Select one)

B.M. in Keyboard Performance
B.A. in Music, Piano Principal
Music Minor, Piano Principal
Piano Class Substitution

(*For secondary lesson, please include appropriate functional skills components below.)
Piano Proficiency Preparation

(*For secondary lesson, please include appropriate functional skills components below.)
Non-music Major Fine Art Elective

(*For secondary lesson, please include appropriate functional skills components below.)
Advanced Study Granted
  Yes

(N/A)

No

(N/A)

Granted
0 %

Yes
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A



Overall Feedback:
Repertoire/Component: Composer 1

Repertoire/Component: Composer 2

Repertoire/Component: Composer 3

Repertoire/Component: Composer 4

Repertoire/Component: Composer 5

Comments



Keywords:
  • Keyboard

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n52