iRubric: Critical Thinking Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Critical Thinking Rubric Presentation Rubric Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html Rubric Code: X4BXC By teacher Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Critical Thinking Descriptions
	Skillful 3 pts	Emerging 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Critical Thinking
CT Outcome 1	Skillful Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.	Emerging Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.	Poor Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.
CT Outcome 2	Skillful Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.	Emerging Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.	Poor Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
CT Outcome 3	Skillful Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation.	Emerging Student's graphics relate to text and presentation.	Poor Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation.
Communication
Com. Outcome 1	Skillful Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.	Emerging Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Poor Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Com. Outcome 2	Skillful Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes.	Emerging Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes.	Poor Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report.
Com. Outcome 3	Skillful Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.	Emerging Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.	Poor Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.