Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Rubric

iRubric: Final Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Rubric 
Rubric Code: J4AA6
By teachme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric MLA Research Paper
  1: Needs Improvement

40

1 pts

2: Emerging .

60

2 pts

3: Proficient

85

3 pts

4: Exemplary

90-100

4 pts

Format

1: Needs Improvement

-- Sources not properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- Many errors in format or punctuation.<BR>
--OR no bibliography.<BR>
--Cover Page does not meet criteria.<BR>
--Many Errors.
2: Emerging .

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- Multiple errors in format or punctuation.<BR>
-- Cover Page does not completely meet criteria. <BR>
--Few errors.
3: Proficient

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- Few errors in format or punctuation.<BR>
----Cover Page Format appropriate to meet criteria.<BR>
--No more than 2 errors
4: Exemplary

--All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page.<BR>
-- Almost zero or no errors in format or punctuation.<BR>
-- Format appropriate to meet criteria. <BR>
--No errors
Content

1: Needs Improvement

--Thesis unclear or non-existent.<BR>
--Or, support for thesis insufficient, <BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.<BR>
--Research is not written in writer's own words
2: Emerging .

--Thesis poorly stated.<BR>
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.<BR>
--Research is not consistently written in writer's own words.
3: Proficient

--Thesis stated clearly.<BR>
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.<BR>
--Research is written in writer's own words. Word choice and sentence structure is appropriate for assignment.
4: Exemplary

--Thesis clear, interesting.<BR>
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.<BR>
--Writer involved with subject.<BR>
--Clear, appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.<BR>
--Research is expertly written in writer's own words with sophisticated word choice and sentence structure.
Grammar and Mechanics

1: Needs Improvement

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.<BR>
-- Ineffective word choice.<BR>
--Spelling errors.<BR>
--Many errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- Many errors in punctuation or capitalization errors.
2: Emerging .

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Correct word choice.<BR>
--Few spelling errors.<BR>
--Few errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
3: Proficient

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Fairly effective word choice.<BR>
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.<BR>
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
4: Exemplary

--Consistent and appropriate voice.<BR>
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.<BR>
--No spelling errors.<BR>
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Quality of research

1: Needs Improvement

--Contains fewer sources than required. <BR>
--Source reliablility questionable. Some sources not cited. Omitted information interferes with ability of reader to find the source.<BR>
--Little information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Insufficient information provided to support thesis.<BR>
--Minimal research.
2: Emerging .

--Failed to cite at least 5 sources <BR>
--Source reliablility questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.<BR>
--Some information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Information provided to support some elements of thesis.<BR>
--Surface research.
3: Proficient

--Cited at least 2 sources <BR>
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.<BR>
--Most information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Sufficient information provided to support most elements of thesis.<BR>
--Research of sufficent depth.
4: Exemplary

--Cited more than 2 sources <BR>
--Sources reliable and properly cited.<BR>
2 quotations<BR>
--All information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of thesis.<BR>
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Section 2
Enter Title

1: Needs Improvement
2: Emerging .
3: Proficient
4: Exemplary



Keywords:
  • Thesis



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16