Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Portfolio Evaluation - Ed.D. Program rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Portfolio Evaluation - Ed.D. Program
Raters will submit their rating forms to the Office of Doctoral Studies Program Director, who will compile the overall results from the two raters (total possible range 0 – 12). The Office of Doctoral Studies Program Director will prepare an evaluation summary that will be submitted to the student’s Academic Advisor/Chair who will review the evaluation with the student within two weeks of receiving the evaluation summary. The student and Academic Advisor/Chair will each sign the evaluation summary, the student will be provided with a copy and the original will be returned to the Office of Doctoral Studies to be included in the student’s program file.
Rubric Code:
N4A2A
By
teachme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Portfolio Evaluation
Descriptions
Yearly Evaluation Form for Student Portfolio – To be filled out each summer and submitted
Good
2 pts
Fair
1 pts
Poor
0 pts
Demonstration
of Student Learning Outcomes
Good
The elements selected precisely link to student learning outcomes and core concepts. Clear links are made between the elements, and demonstration of student learning outcomes for core elements, students’ knowledge, skills and growth.
Fair
The elements selected link to student learning outcomes and core concepts. Although links are made between the elements and student learning outcomes for core elements, students’ knowledge, skills and growth the insight is limited.
Poor
The elements selected are not linked to student learning outcomes or core concepts. Few links are made between the elements and demonstration of student learning outcomes for core elements, students’ knowledge, skills and growth.
Quality of Research/Scholarship
Good
The portfolio clearly demonstrates research activities and progress toward dissertation completion. The elements included are highly representative of where the student is in completing his/her dissertation given the time in the program.
Fair
The portfolio shows some indication of research activities and progress toward dissertation completion; however, these are not focused on the dissertation topic. The elements included indicate the student is not making adequate progress on his/her dissertation given the time in the program.
Poor
The portfolio lacks evidence of research or scholarship. Insufficient progress on completing the dissertation is noted given the length of time involved in the program.
Quality of Reflection and Analysis
Good
The reflection shows thorough and rigorous analysis throughout. Clear links are made between the elements, significant use of data in research and dissertation activities, and clear demonstration of student learning outcomes for core elements, students’ knowledge, skills and growth.
Fair
The reflection and analysis shows thorough and rigorous analysis in some but not all parts. Although links are made between the elements and there are examples of data in research and dissertation activities, student learning outcomes for core elements, students’ knowledge, skills and growth the insight is limited.
Poor
The reflection and analysis do not demonstrate thorough and rigorous analysis. Few links are made between the elements, there is limited data in application, research and dissertation activities, and there is not clear demonstration of student learning outcomes for core elements, students’ knowledge, skills and growth.
Subjects:
Education
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.