Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: RFP Vendor Evaluation Rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
RFP Vendor Evaluation Rubric
Rubric Code:
N4B47
By
teachme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
RFP Vendor Evaluation Rubric
Descriptions
Exemplary/Excellent
5 pts
Accomplished/Good
4 pts
Developing/Fair
3 pts
Deficient/Poor
2 pts
Product Description
1 pts
Exemplary/Excellent
The product and its purpose are clearly described. The reader knows precisely what items are being reviewed and their relevance to the project is immediately apparent.
Accomplished/Good
The product researched is clearly defined and described in the paper. Topic is sufficiently narrow for adequate coverage.
Developing/Fair
Product is described adequately for the reader. Topic may still be too broad for the given length and scope of the project.
Deficient/Poor
No definition of the product researched in the paper, or the topic is so broad it cannot be adequately covered in the assigned length of the paper.
Available Products
4 pts
Exemplary/Excellent
Products from both major and minor manufacturers are reviewed. Quantity of products reviewed is proportional to the size of the market.
Accomplished/Good
Review of products is thorough and extensive. Major manufacturers are included, but some specialized organizations may have been omitted.
Developing/Fair
A few relevant and inter-related products are described, but the reader is not confident that all relevant sources have been researched.
Deficient/Poor
Products described are not related to each other and are irrelevant to the project. Sources appear random and unrelated.
Product Specifications
3 pts
Exemplary/Excellent
Product specifications and costs are clearly presented in one central location. All relevant features used in selecting the product are described. Tables of specifications are well organized.
Accomplished/Good
Product specifications and costs are clearly presented in one central location. Most important features used in product selection are described, with one or two minor omissions. Tables of specifications are well organized.
Developing/Fair
Product specifications and costs are included but are not organized in one central location. some important criteria are omitted. Information appears to be mostly cut and pasted from the web, with little modification from the student. Tables need to be included or need improvement.
Deficient/Poor
Product information is simply cut and pasted from the web. Product specifications and costs are not included or are very difficult to find. Poorly constructed tables.
Product Selection
3 pts
Exemplary/Excellent
All product/vendor selection criteria are presented (cost, performance, etc.) and all candidates are objectively evaluated. Reader can easily follow the reasons for product selection. The best products and vendors are selected.
Accomplished/Good
All product/vendor selection criteria are presented and all candidates are objectively evaluated. Reader can follow the reasons for product selection, but lapses in organization are present. The best products/vendors are selected.
Developing/Fair
Most, but not all, relevant selection criteria are presented. Candidates are objectively evaluated. Reasons for product selection may be difficult to follow, so there is some doubt that the best candidates were selected.
Deficient/Poor
Major selection criteria are omitted from the evaluation. Lack of organization makes it difficult to follow the reasons for product selection. The best products/vendors do not appear to be selected.
References
1 pts
Exemplary/Excellent
All information sources are listed at the end of the paper, along with date information was retrieved and a description of the web page, catalog, or brochure. All information in the report is clearly linked to the source list, including graphs and diagrams.
Accomplished/Good
All information sources are listed at the end of the paper. All information in the report is clearly linked to the source list. Some source information was omitted, but not enough to concern the reader about the validity of the reference.
Developing/Fair
Most information sources are stated somewhere in the paper, but it may be difficult to retrace the sources or the search.
Deficient/Poor
Information sources are not listed. References in the paper are almost untraceable.
Keywords:
vendor, RFP, patent, bid, product features
Subjects:
Engineering
(General)
Types:
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.