Skip to main content
iRubric: Literature review rubric

iRubric: Literature review rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literature review 
A literature review rubric for general use in graduate programmes
Rubric Code: P4AAW
By teachme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric INTRODUCTION
20 %
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Problem statement

Poor

Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the article
Fair

Readers are aware of the overall problem, challenge, or topic of the article
Good

The topic is introduced, and groundwork is laid as to the direction of the article
BODY
50 %
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Flow of the review

Poor

The literature review appears to have no direction, with subtopics appearing disjointed.
Fair

There is a basic flow from one section to the next, but not all sections or paragraphs follow in a natural or logical order
Good

The literature review goes from general ideas to specific conclusions. Transitions tie sections together, as well as adjacent paragraphs
Coverage of content

Poor

Major research contributors are missing. Too much focus on one or two research articles.
Fair

A wide range of sources have been identified and used. Sources are fairly reported on.
Good

The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the course is unquestionable.
Clear writing

Poor

It is hard to know what the writer is trying to express. Writing is convoluted. Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, and improper punctuation are evident.
Fair

Writing is generally clear, but unnecessary words are occasionally used. Meaning is sometimes hidden. Paragraph or sentence structure is too repetitive. Few (3) spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are made.
Good

Writing is crisp, clear, and succinct. The writer incorporates the active voice when appropriate and supports ideas with examples. No spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are made.
CONCLUSION
20 %
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Conclusion

Poor

There is no indication the author tried to synthesize the information or make a conclusion based on the literature under review.
Fair

The author provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions, however, were not supported in the body of the report.
Good

The author was able to make succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. Insights into the problem are appropriate.
REFERECES
10 %
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

APA referencing

Poor

Citation for the article did not follow APA format and was missing essential information
Fair

Citation for the article did follow APA format; however; a few (2) errors in essential information were evident
Good

Citation for the article did follow APA format. Essential information was accurate and complete.



Keywords:
  • Literature review, graduate

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16