Skip to main content
iRubric: Curriculum Map Rubric

iRubric: Curriculum Map Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Curriculum Map Rubric 
This rubric will be used to assess a 10th grade English curriculum map. References: University of Hawaii. (2008). "Learning outcomes and curriculum maps." Retrieved from the website: https://manoa.hawaii.edu/assessment/workshops/pdf/SLOs_curriculummaps2008-1 0.pdf NYC DOE. (2011). "Curriculum mapping and alignment coaching rubric." Retrieved from the website: http://www.curriculum21.com/z-docs/CMimplementationRubric.pdf
Rubric Code: V4B96
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Curriculum Map Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Exemplary

(N/A)

Student Learning Outcomes

Poor

The list of outcomes is
problematic: e.g., very
incomplete, inappropriate, disorganized, includes only discipline specific learning, ignoring relevant school-wide
learning. The list may confuse learning processes with learning outcomes (e.g., application of theory to real-world problems).
Fair

The list includes reasonable outcomes but does not specify
expectations for the program as a whole. Relevant school-wide
learning outcomes and/or national disciplinary standards
may be ignored.
Good

The list is a well-organized set of
reasonably outcomes that focus on the key knowledge, skills, and
values students learn in the class. It includes relevant school-wide outcomes (e.g.,
communication or critical thinking
skills). Outcomes are appropriate for the level
Exemplary

The list is reasonable, appropriate, and
comprehensive. Relevant
school-wide learning outcomes are included. Faculty have agreed
on explicit criteria for assessing (e.g., rubric, exam answers) students' level of mastery for each outcome.
Mapping Process

Poor

There is no evidence that this “curriculum map” illustrates any understanding of curriculum development
and/or any understanding of
the mapping process.
There is no evidence of a common mapping format, nor is there any consistent design. There is no evidence that the “curriculum maps” align to the NH
State Standards in ELA. There is little evidence of common curriculum
embedded assessments are aligned to the NH State Standards, they
are not aligned to the
Fair

This “curriculum map” illustrates some of the understandings that should be included in the map. The curriculum maps have some alignment to the NH State Standards. Curriculum embedded
assessments have little to no connection to the goal and/or big ideas.
Good

The curriculum map has clear and consistent alignment to the ELA NH State Standards. There is clear evidence that the common curriculum embedded assessments are aligned with the NH State Standards expectations; they are
carefully aligned to the unit’s goals and/or“big ideas.”
Exemplary

All curriculum maps convey a deep understanding of the
curriculum mapping process.to ensure
alignment to the NH State Standards Curriculum embedded assessments are attached to the maps, aligned with the NH State Standards expectations and ensure alignment. Rubrics, and assessments are attached to the maps.
Assessable Outcomes

Poor

Outcome statements do not identify what students can do to demonstrate learning. Statements such as "Students understand scientific method" do not specify how understanding can be demonstrated and assessed.
Fair

Most of the outcomes indicate how students can demonstrate their learning.
Good

Each outcome describes how students can demonstrate learning.
E.g., "Students can write reports in APA style."
Exemplary

Outcomes describe how students can
demonstrate their learning. Faculty have agreed on explicit criteria statements, such
as rubrics, and have identified examples of student performance at varying levels for
each outcome.
Assessment Planning

Poor

There is no formal plan for
assessing each outcome.
Fair

The program relies on short term planning, such as selecting which outcome(s) to assess in
the current year.
Good

The program has a reasonable, multi-year assessment plan that
identifies when each outcome will be assessed. The plan may explicitly include analysis and implementation of improvements.
Exemplary

The program has a fully-articulated,
sustainable, multi-year assessment plan
that describes when and how each outcome will be assessed and how improvements based on findings will be implemented. The plan is routinely examined and
revised, as needed.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16