Skip to main content

iRubric: ePortfolio Evaluation rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ePortfolio Evaluation 
The following rubric has been adapted by the ePortfolio Portal team as an example of the evaluation of eportfolios. The exact criteria will depend on the purpose of the evaluation. Source: http://www.danwilton.com/eportfolios/rubric.php
Rubric Code: L4AC2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric ePortfolio Evaluation
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Narration and Analysis
3 pts

Poor

The purpose of the portfolio is missing, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Fair

The purpose of the portfolio is somewhat vague and unclear, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Good

Overall, the purpose of the portfolio is clear throughout the portfolio, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Excellent

Purpose of the portfolio is clear throughout the portfolio, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Examples
3 pts

Professional and Classroom Materials
Poor

Most of the professional and classroom samples do not relate to the purpose of the eportfolio.
Fair

Several professional and classroom samples are not related to the purpose of the eportfolio. Several examples are unorganized and unclear.
Good

Most professional and classroom samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. One or two examples are unorganized or unrelated.
Excellent

All professional and classroom samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio and are well-organized.
Use of Multimedia
2 pts

Poor

The use of multimedia lacks creativity and is distracting.
Fair

The use of multimedia somewhat enhances the purpose of the eportfolio and creates interest; however it is lacking in creativity and originality.
Good

Most of the use of multimedia enhances the purpose of the eportfolio, creates interest, and is appropriate and original.
Excellent

The use of multimedia enhances the purpose of the eportfolio, creates interest, and is appropriate and original.
Descriptions
1 pts

Explanations that accompany examples
Poor

None of the descriptions contain an explanation.
Fair

Some of the descriptions contain explanations that clearly explain the significance of the professional or classroom material.
Good

Most of the descriptions contain an explanation that clearly explains the significance of the professional or classroom material.
Excellent

Each description contains an explanation that clearly explains the significance of the professional or classroom material.
Grammar and Punctuation
1 pts

Poor

The text has more than 6 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Clearly, the portfolio was not proofread.
Fair

There are 4 or more errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring editing and revision.
Good

There are a few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. These require minor editing and revision.
Excellent

There are no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Design
Navigation
1 pts

Poor

There are significant problems with portfolio navigation links and many pages and links do not function correctly or do not connect to the appropriate pages.
Fair

Some of the portfolio links function properly. Other links connect to pages no longer current. The portfolio is missing several links to the Home page or other pages.
Good

Most of the portfolio links function properly and are up-to-date. The majority of pages include a way to navigate back to the Home page.
Excellent

All of the portfolio links function properly and are up-to-date. Each page includes a way to navigate back to the Home page.
Layout and Design
1 pts

Poor

The portfolio is difficult to read. Formatting is awkward and design features detract from the content. Most of the pages are not balanced or appear cluttered and backgrounds are overdone and are distracting or do not compliment the content.
Fair

The portfolio is somewhat difficult to read. Formatting is awkward and design features detract from the content. Some of the pages are not balanced and backgrounds are overdone and are distracting or do not compliment the content.
Good

Overall, the portfolio is easy to read. Design features, such as font and size, titles, subtitles, page headings, and paragraphs enhance the portfolio. On the majority of pages, content is well-balanced and pictures and backgrounds, overall, do not detract from the content. Only minor changes are needed to enhance the portfolio.
Excellent

The eportfolio is easy to read. Design features, such as font and size, titles, subtitles, page headings, and paragraphs enhance the portfolio. The pages are well-balanced and pictures and backgrounds do not detract from the content.



Keywords:
  • eportfolio, e-portfolio

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n67