Skip to main content

iRubric: CT, Comm., PR Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CT, Comm., PR Rubric 
Critical Thinking & Communication Rubric
Derived from AAC&U VALUE rubrics for Critical Thinking, Communication, and Personal Responsibility
Rubric Code: P4B63
By teachme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric CT, Comm., PR Rubric
  Capstone

3 pts

Milestone

2 pts

Benchmark

1 pts

Critical Thinking
CT Outcome 1

Capstone

Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.
Milestone

Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.
Benchmark

Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description.
CT Outcome 2

Capstone

Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
Milestone

Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.
Benchmark

Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question.
CT Outcome 3

Capstone

Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
Milestone

Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position.
Benchmark

Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position.
Communication
Comm. Outcome 1

Capstone

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work.
Milestone

Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context).
Benchmark

Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience).
Comm. Outcome 2

Capstone

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer's understanding, and shaping the whole work.
Milestone

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work.
Benchmark

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work.
Comm. Outcome 3

Capstone

Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free.
Milestone

Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors.
Benchmark

Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.
Social Responsibility
SR Outcome 1

Capstone

Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
Milestone

Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
Benchmark

Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
SR Outcome 2

Capstone

Provides evidence of experience in civic-engagement activities and describes what she/he has learned about her or himself as it relates to a reinforced and clarified sense of civic identity and continued commitment to public action.
Milestone

Provides evidence of experience in civic-engagement activities and describes what she/he has learned about her or himself as it relates to a growing sense of civic identity and commitment.
Benchmark

Provides little evidence of her/his experience in civic-engagement activities and does not connect experiences to civic identity.
SR Outcome 3

Capstone

Demonstrates independent experience and shows initiative in team leadership of complex or multiple civic engagement activities, accompanied by reflective insights or analysis about the aims and accomplishments of one’s actions.
Milestone

Demonstrates independent experience and team leadership of civic action, with reflective insights or analysis about the aims and accomplishments of one’s actions.
Benchmark

Has experimented with some civic activities but shows little internalized understanding of their aims or effects and little commitment to future action.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n79